<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Opa on Sakura Sky: Cloud, Data, Security</title><link>https://www.sakurasky.com/tags/opa/</link><description>Recent content in Opa on Sakura Sky: Cloud, Data, Security</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><copyright>Sakura Sky</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.sakurasky.com/tags/opa/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>GATE v1.3: New Controls for Shadow Agents, Data Quality, and Model Drift</title><link>https://www.sakurasky.com/blog/gate-v1-3-release/</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://www.sakurasky.com/blog/gate-v1-3-release/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;GATE v1.3 ships today. The Governed Agent Trust Environment, which I published in April as a fully open framework for enterprise agent governance, has been extended with three new controls and a CLI conformance runner. The four-layer architecture is unchanged; v1.3 closes three assumptions that v1.2.8 left implicit.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>GATE: The Missing Infrastructure Layer for Agentic AI</title><link>https://www.sakurasky.com/blog/gate-launch/</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://www.sakurasky.com/blog/gate-launch/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There is a moment in every enterprise AI project when the demo stops being the point.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The demo worked. The agent read the documents, reasoned through the problem, and produced the right answer. Now someone asks: can we put this in production? And the honest answer - the one that derails projects and delays roadmaps - is: not safely, not yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>